Interior Principal Secretary Raymond Omollo now finds himself at the centre of political controversy after Embakasi East MP Babu Owino accused him of being linked to the disruption of opposition activities in Nyanza. The claims come at a time when political mobilisation is increasing ahead of the next General Election, especially in Nyanza and parts of western Kenya. While Omollo has built a public image as a calm and efficient technocrat who supports youth empowerment initiatives, his name is now being drawn into a heated political dispute.
Babu Owino has publicly alleged that organised youth groups were mobilised to intimidate and disrupt opposition events. According to the legislator, more than 200 individuals were deployed to block movement and cause chaos during recent political engagements in Kisumu. He described the incidents as planned and not accidental. Owino argued that the disruptions were designed to silence political opponents and weaken their support in the region.
The MP further claimed that the youths involved were promised payment for their participation.
He alleged that some recruits said they were to receive Sh1,000 each to interfere with opposition programmes. In his view, such actions do not amount to empowerment but instead represent sponsored violence. Owino insisted that the pattern of disruption points to organised coordination rather than spontaneous unrest.
These accusations have added tension to an already charged political atmosphere. Nyanza has long been a stronghold of opposition politics, making it a key battleground as the country moves closer to the next General Election.
Any claims of state-backed interference in the region carry serious political weight. Even perceptions of intimidation can shape public opinion and influence campaign strategies.
Beyond the direct exchange between Owino and Omollo lies a wider political debate. Some critics argue that youth empowerment networks, if not carefully managed, can become tools for political mobilisation. Structures initially introduced to provide economic support and opportunities for young people may, in certain situations, be used to advance political interests. This concern is growing as rival camps prepare for intense competition in the coming election period.
In regions like Nyanza, where past elections have sometimes been marked by tension, the boundary between mobilisation and intimidation can be delicate.
Political gatherings often attract large crowds, and disagreements can quickly escalate. This makes allegations of organised disruption particularly sensitive.
The central question remains unresolved. Are these groups genuine platforms for economic empowerment and youth participation, or are they becoming instruments of political pressure in an increasingly tense moments.